Sorry for hogging all the blogging, but I have to comment on the so-called "Movement Movement". I would like to first applaud the critical audience members calling out some interesting points such as what sort of movement they are actually trying to create.
My opinion is that this is a simple group activity, nothing more. The whole idea that they are trying to challenge rules or "break" social conventions is completely out to lunch, as a few audience members illustrated. It seems that this an event about breaking the rules, as long as nobody breaks the rules that were agreed to by the event coordinators and the museum management. "Bringing your dog is a bit of a stretch" one of them said. "No spitting" was another. Ridiculous. If you want to challenge the system, you outright challenge it. You don't proceed with lengthy discussions and compromises in order to get permission. Bring on the flash mobs, I say.
As the guy in the green hat mentioned, there is an election happening as we speak. Why not make this event worthwhile and base it on a political platform? Why wouldn't they substantiate this whole project by giving it some tangible meaning? My guess is that the museum would never allow a politically aimed project in the doors.
Another ridiculous point was mentioning sponsorship from Nike as being improper due to questionable business practice but then saying they were sponsored by American Apparel. If these girls knew what they were talking about they would be well aware that American Apparel is involved in some pretty shady operating practices as well. "We were into a short shorts thing" was their reasoning. Please.
I think (or hope, rather) that the steam is being let out of this balloon really fast. It's all fine if their intentions were to simply get a large group of people together in order to have a bit of fun at the museum and run around, but to attach arbitrary meanings to the event is plain old silly.
Forgive me for my ramblings, but I have a hard time swallowing "movements" that are not based around a critical analysis of it's own intentions. So please, challenge this perspective if you will.